V City Name Technology Perfect Lie Detector Tests Essential for You Now

Perfect Lie Detector Tests Essential for You Now



Also known as a polygraph, the
lie detector consists of a set of sensors that measure the rate of breathing,
blood pressure, heart rate and sweat on the person’s fingertips. The
functioning of the device is based on the theory that these reactions of the
organism change when you lie. A polygraph test is also known as a
psychophysiological fraud detection test. Regarding the Lie detector test
prices uk
 

also you can have the perfect solutions now.

Reason For Usage

The polygraph is widely used in the United States in criminal, civil and labor charges, including the existence of an UK Polygraph Association. Thepolice is the only one that uses software called Multilayer Voice Analyzer.

  • To prove is to produce a state of certainty, in
    the judge’s conscience and mind, for his conviction, regarding the existence or
    non-existence of a fact, or the truth or falsity of a statement about a factual
    situation that is considered of interest to a decision judicial or the solution
    of a process.
  • The Federal Constitution, in its article 5, item
    LVI, a discipline that “the evidence obtained by unlawful means is inadmissible
    in the process” and the Code of Criminal Procedure, in article 157, as amended
    by Law No. 11,690 / 2008, determines that “illicit evidence, thus
    understood to be obtained in violation of constitutional or legal rules, is
    inadmissible and must be removed from the process.”

The Polygraph Test As A Proof

The Judiciary has not yet
admitted such evidence in criminal proceedings. The Superior Courts have
already established abundant jurisprudence, removing the polygraph as a means
of proof due to the lack of legal support for its use in our criminal
procedural system. It is evidence without legal value, which does not meet the
principles of due process, contradictory, and the bilateral nature of
procedural acts.

There are lawyers who admit their
exceptional admissibility in criminal proceedings in the country, demonstrating
the relativization of the inadmissibility of illicit evidence in the face of
the principles of proportionality and reasonableness provided for in the
Constitution. As a general rule, the principle of prohibition against illicit
evidence should not be seen as absolute, being exceptionally highlighted,
whenever a significant value is at stake, and a less important principle may
yield to one of greater social relevance.

Conclusion

This has been gaining strength through
constitutional principles, through which it is sought to have a limit in
relation to the proportion of the specific case, and the judge must make a
careful and careful analysis. There is a strong current, mainly on the part of
lawyers, that the evidence may be admitted, not being illegal, when it is, for
example, proof of the accused’s innocence, considering that the defense is
broad or full.